With the release of Nick Carr's latest book, The Shallows -- basically an extended riff on his silly and easily debunked article from The Atlantic a few years ago -- Carr is now getting plenty of press coverage for his claims.
Looking at the debate going on with the internet, you have to wonder yourself is the internet making you smarter, or are we all subjects of a mass media making us dumber and just itching for someone to take over our boredom?
Carr goes on to state that emerging research is very troubling and that people who are continually distracted by emails, alerts and understand less than those who are able to concentrate. He goes on to say that when were constantly distracted we cannot forge strong neural connections that give depth and distinctiveness to our thinking, we merely become signal processing units.
Carr points out that in an article published in Science, Patricia Greenfield reviewed studies on how different media technologies influence us.
Carr points to an experiment conducted at Cornell University where half of a class room was allowed to use the internet during a lecture and the other half was not.
Those who browsed the Web performed much worse on subsequent tests. Scientists have discovered, the human brain adapts to the tools we use.
Shirky make the reader feel as though this is an age old tale stating that this is what always happens, every increase in freedom to create or consume media, from paperback books to YouTube, alarms people accustomed to the restrictions of the old system, convincing them that the new media will make young people stupid.
This fear dates back to at least the invention of movable type. It also led to vulgar versions of the bible and distracting secular writings. Which fueled religious unrest and civic confusion, leading to claims that if the printing press were not controlled it would lead to utter chaos and dismemberment of European intellectual life.
Shirky continues on appealing to his readers that even though these claims were correct, we built new norms around newly abundant and contemporary literature.
Novels, newspapers, scientific journals etc… all of these innovations were created and all had the effect of increasing, rather than decreasing the intellectual range and output of society.
As Shirkey continues he appeals the readers talking about current events involving them and stating that we are living through a similar explosion of publishing capability today, where digital media link over a billion people into the same network.
Our cognitive surplus is so enormous that diverting even a tiny fraction of time from consumption participation can create enormous positive effects. Shirky points to Wikipedia to build credibility and trust stating that Wikipedia took the idea of peer and applied it to volunteers on a global scale, becoming the most important English reference work in less than 10 years.
It only takes a fractional shift in the direction of participation to create remarkable new educational resources. He continues building credibility stating that similarly, open source software has been critical to the spread of the web and that great things have come from it.
Websites like PatientsLikeMe, designed to accelerate medical research by getting patients to publicly share their health information, appealing to the shared sense of seeking medical progress which helps him show that indeed the internet has useful benefits.
Shirky goes on to generate the readers curiosity by stating the response to distraction, then as now was social structure. Reading is as unnatural act: Literate societies become literate by investing extraordinary resources, every year, training children to read.
It is now our turn to figure out what we need to do to shape our use of digital tools. He believes there are three reasons to think that the Internet will fuel the intellectual achievements of 21st century society.
The Net, in fact, restores reading and writing as central activities in our culture. He continues on appealing to the reader that there is a worth to the Internet and things that it contains.
Several early uses of our cognitive surplus, like open source software, look like they will pass the test for the future.
Lastly Shirky relates directly with his readers as we are all living through the largest expansion in expressive capability in human history. Just as required education was a response to print, using the Internet well will require new cultural institutions as well, not just new technologies.
We have increased freedom to create which means increased freedom to create throwaway material, there is no easy way to get through a media revolution of this magnitude: In conclusion it is easy to live on both sides of these arguments, as it is easy to see that Carr has valid points that there are large amounts of shallow material on the Internet.
I feel it is good that we have a well-rounded base of literature and media as well. There is no escaping the fact that as we continue into the future our society as a whole will continue to advance technology and recreate what we know about our own media.The title of this article is Does the Internet Make You Smarter?It is written by Clay Shirky.
The article is written in the Wall Street Journal. This journal entry is written to people who are used to the old routines of past and think that the internet is going to make the new generation stupid.
This is also written to the new generation that is supposedly going to be so stupid, as a. The article Does the internet make you smarter or dumber by Clay Shirky takes a most positive stance towards the internet, stating that it is one of the most 4 Pages ( words) Essay How Google Is .
In the articles, “Does the internet make you smarter” by Clay Shirky supporter of literacy by internet and, “Does the internet make you dumber”, by Nicholas Carr unsupporter of literacy by internet, portrays that each article have different points of views regarding the internet making us smarter or dumber.
Authors Nick Carr and Clay Shirky have dueling essays appearing in The Wall Street Journal this weekend that look Is the Internet making us smarter or dumber?
Authors Nick Carr and Clay Shirky have dueling essays appearing in The Wall Street Journal this weekend.
After having read the essay, “Does the Internet Make You Smarter?*”, I was immediately overwhelmed with thoughts about this particular topic.
Clay Shirky, the writer of this essay, approaches this topic in a very comparative manner. Books I’ve read. Tiny summary but detailed notes for caninariojana.com the ISBN number to find it from your local library or anywhere else. This page will constantly update as I read more, so bookmark it if you want to check back in a few months..
Sorted with my top recommendations up caninariojana.com by title, newest, or best. And please read this FAQ page about these notes, if you have any questions.